B.O. Chernov. THE UNITY OF GEOGRAPHY: MYTH OR REALITY?

https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2017.01.066
Ukr. geogr. z. 2017, N1:66-71
Authors: 

B.O. Chernov - Grygorii Skovoroda Pereiaslav-Khmelnitskii State Pedagogical University.

Abstract: 

The world crisis of the 60-s the beginning of the 90-s years of the past century covered the geographical science, which caused a general world tendency as strengthening sectoral differentiation of geographic subjects, but all this increased interest to integration, and to complex physical and social geography and the need to substantiate the unified geography. A historiographic analysis showed an attempt of foreign geographers to prove the unity of geography from excogitated unsubstantiated suggestions to abstract mathematical models or neglect of unity in general. It has been suggested to impossibility union of the two branches of geography in the near future.

Key words: 
physical geography, socio-economic geography, social geography, unity geography, the problem of unity, variants of unity, neglect unity geography
Pages: 
66-71
References: 

1. Anuchin V.A. (1972). Theoretical Foundations of Geography. Moscow: Mysl. [In Russian]. [Анучин В. А. Теоретические основы географии. – М.: Мысль, 1972. – 430 с.].
 
2. Battimer A. (1990). Way in Geography. Translated from the English by A.V. Tarusov. Moscow: Progress. [In Russian]. [Баттимер А. Путь в географию; пер. з англ.А. В. Тарусова. – М.: Прогресс, 1990. – 440 с.]
 
3. Dresh Zh. (1977). Modern Geography and the International Geographical Union. Results of the XXIII International Geographical Congress. Moscow: Znaniie, 5-13. [In Russian]. [Дреш Ж. Современная география и международный географический союз / Итоги ХХШ Междунар. геогр. Конгресса. – М.: Знание, 1977. – С. 5-13.]
 
4. Isachenko A.G. (1986). In Search of Methodological Foundations of Geography Unity. Overview Perspective. Proceedings of the VGO, 118 (4), 377-386. [In Russian]. [Исаченко А. Г. В поисках методологических основ единства географии (обзор точек зрения) // Известия ВГО. – 1986. – 118. – № 4. – С. 377-386.]
 
5. Isachenko A.G. (1986). History of Geographical Ideas in the Researches of British and American Geographers (new books of publishing house Progress). Proceedings of the VGO, 6, 536-540. [In Russian]. [Исаченко А. Г. История географических идей в освещении британских и американских географов (новые книги издательства «Прогресс») / Известия ВГО. – 1986. – Вып. 6. – С. 536-540.]
 
6. Sychova L.S. (1987). The Specificity of Geography as a Science. Study of Methodological Problems of Geography in the Estonian SSR. Theses of reports and messages. Tallinn, 3-5 Feb., 1987. Tallin, 95-99. [In Russian]. [Сычова Л.С. Специфика географии как науки / Исследование методологических проблем географии в ЭССР; тезисы докладов и сообщений. Таллин, 3-5 февр., 1987. – Таллин, 1987. – С.95-99].
 
7. Chernov B.A., Sharukha I.M. The Peculiarities of Geographical Sciences Development in 1950-1980. Mogilev Meridian. Mogilev. Vol. 15, 1-3 (28-30), 25-29. [In Belarussian]. [Чернов Б. А., Шаруха І. М. Асаблівосці развіцця географічнай навукі у 1950-1980 гады / Магілёускі мерыдыян. – Магілёу: – Том 15. – Вип. 1-3 (28-30). – С. 25-29].
 
8. Berezowski S. (1985). Zintegrowany dualizm geografii. Czsopismo geograficzne. 56, 2. 129-138.
 
9. Julie Tuason. A. (1987) Reconciling the unity and diversity of geography. Journal of Geography (USA), 87, 5, 190-193.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00221348708979483