Yu. Ishchenko. TERRITORIAL ORGANIZATION OF INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY: THEORETICAL METHODOLOGICAL AND PRACTICAL RESEARCH ASPECTS

https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2014.02.032
Ukr. geogr. z. 2014, N2:32-39
Authors: 

Yu. Ishchenko – Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv.

Abstract: 

The paper highlights the key stages in the development of innovation activity research theory. Based on Ukrainian realities, the necessity to improve the national methodology has been demonstrated. The approach to study of territorial innovation activity organization in context of socio-economic growth poles formation, which involves the implementation of geographical patenting process analysis has been proposed.

Key words: 
innovation activity, socio-economic growth pole, patenting centre
Pages: 
32-39
References: 

1. Budkin V. (2010). Innovative model of national economies development. Ukraine Economy, 6, 67-78. [in Ukrainian].
 
2. Innovative and technological development in Ukraine: state, problems and strategic prospects. Analytics to Parliamentary Hearings Strategy of Ukraine Innovative Development for 2010-2020 under globalization challenges; edited by L.I. Fedulova, G.O.Androshchuk (2009). Kyiv: Institute of Economics and Forecasting at Ukraine NAS. [in Ukrainian].
 
3. Ishchenko Yu.D. (2014). Study of geography of patenting in Ukraine: general trends. Geopolitics and ecogeodynamics of regions. Vol. 10, 2, 560-564. [in Russian].
 
4. Ishchenko Yu.D. (2013). Local territorial innovative systems in the world and the problem of their formation in Ukraine. Geographic and geoeconomic Studies in Ukraine and adjacent territories: materials of international scientific conference, 2-7 April 2013. Simferopol: "DIAYPI", Vol.1, 160-165. [in Ukrainian].
 
5. Ishchenko Yu.D. (2012). Development of conceptual approaches to territorial organization of innovation activity study. Scientific Journal of the National Pedagogical University after Dragomanov. Series 4: Geography and modern time, Vol. 16 (28), 8-15. [in Ukrainian].
 
6. Kravchuk V.V., Grynchuk V.M. (2013). The impact of innovation activities on enterprises competitiveness in Khmelnitsky region. Science and Innovations, 4, 79-90. [in Ukrainian].
 
7. Kuzmin O., Zhezhuha V. (2010). Clusters as a factor in innovative development of enterprises and territorial entities. Economy of Ukraine, 2, 14-24. [in Ukrainian].
 
8. Ukraine regional innovation systems: formation and development state in the context of integration processes: monograph; Edited by Dr. of sciences. Prof. L.I. Fedulova (2013). Institute of Economics and Forecasting at Ukraine NAS, Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
 
9. Rudenko L.G. (2002). Production systems: From local territorial production systems to clusters. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 1, 77-78. [in Ukrainian].
 
10. Seminozhenko V.P. (2011). Agency of changes. Innovation and investment development problems, 2, 7-15. [in Ukrainian].
 
11. Synergy of space: regional innovation systems, clusters, and knowledge flows; supervising editor A.N. Pilyasov (2012). Smolensk: Ojkumena. [in Russian].
 
12. Solovyev V.P. (2011). On innovations place in the modern Ukraine economic system. Innovation and investment development problems, 2, 100-110. [in Ukrainian].
 
13. Tatsuno Sh. (1989). Strategy – technopoles; translated From English; edited and introduction by V.I. Danilov-Danilian. Moscow: Progress. [in Russian].
 
14. Fedulova L.I., Buga N.Yu. (2010). Innovative development of problem regions. National University of Shipbuilding after Admiral Makarov. Mikolayiv: NUK. [in Ukrainian].
 
15. Fedulova L.I. (2006). Prospects of Ukraine industry innovative development. Economics and Forecasting, 2, 58-76. [in Ukrainian].
 
16. Hvesyk M.A., Stepanenko A.V., Obyhod G.O. et al. (2013). Innovation, investment and technological security of regional economies transformation; editor M.A. Hvesyk. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka. [in Ukrainian].
 
17. Center and periphery in regional development. O.V. Gritsay, G.V. Ioffe, A.I. Treyvi (1991). Moscow: Nauka. [in Russian].
 
18. Sheruin E.B. (2004). The Silicon Valley way: set of basic rules for success in the high tech; translated From English by M. Panova. Moscow: AST; Tranzitkniga. [in Russian].
 
19. Schumpeter Y. History of Economic Analysis; translated From English, edited by V.S. Avtonomov. In 3 Volumes (2001). SPb.: School of Economics. [in Russian].
 
20. Shchelkunov V. (2004). Integration processes and scientific and technological development in Ukraine under the conditions of globalization. Bulletin of KNTU, 5, 81-86. [in Ukrainian].
 
21. Yatsenko B.P. (2014). Knowledge economics: today's Japan scientific and production complex. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 1, 27-26. [in Ukrainian].
 
22. Breschi, S., Malerba, F. (1997). Sectoral innovation systems: Technological regimes, Shumpeterian dynamics and spatial boundaries, in Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organisations, C. Edquist, ed., Pinter, London, 130-156.
 
23. Cooke P., Uranga, MG, Extebarria G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutions and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, vol. 26, 475-491.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
 
24. Sternberg, R. (2000). Innovation networks and regional development. Evidence From the European Regional Innovation survey (ERIS): Theoretical concepts, methodological approach, empirical basis and introduction to the theme issue. European Planning Studies, vol. 8, 4, 389-407.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713666420