Eu.O. Maruniak, S.A. Lisovskyi, S.A. Pokliatskyi, A.A. Mozghovyi, A.O .Petrovska, M.V. Rumiantseva. DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPITAL CITY THROUGH THE PRISM OF INCLUSIVENESS (A CASE OF KYIV)

DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2021.01.025
Ukr. geogr. z. 2021, N1:25-33
Language of publication: 
Ukrainian
Authors: 

Eu.O. Maruniak - Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv;
S.A. Lisovskyi - Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv;
S.A. Pokliatskyi - Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv;
A.A. Mozghovyi - Institute of Geography of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv;
A.O .Petrovska - Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv;
M.V. Rumiantseva - Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv.

Abstract: 

The problem of inclusive development has recently taken into account in Ukraine, although at the global level and in the EU such discussions have been going on for a long time, as well as key concepts were included in the documents shaping the international policy agenda. The paper aims to identify local markers of inclusion and/or exclusion within the capital post-socialist city, verify participatory approaches within the context of sustainable urban development research, and create a basis for developing recommendations for further improvement of urban policy in Ukraine. The example of the capital, Kyiv, a city that has been integrated into the global economic landscape for several decades, is the most indicative from the point of view of current and anticipated changes. The article outlines the main features of modern discourse in the field of inclusiveness and integrated urban development. On the case of Kyiv and a few urban neighborhoods, based on a survey and expert assessment, local features of the spatial measurement of inclusiveness, such as accessibility and openness of different types of infrastructural objects, organization of urban space, have been analyzed. The surveys, in addition to positive assessments of the availability of urban infrastructure for residents, and high quality of construction of individual facilities, simultaneously have been revealed significant shortcomings, especially for people with disabilities. The role of urban governance and international projects outcomes to achieve new goals of urban environment quality in Ukraine has been emphasized. The scientific novelty of the article is to identify local signs of inclusiveness and exclusivity in the capital city of a post-socialist country in the context of improving urban policy in Ukraine.

Key words: 
inclusiveness, accessibility, urban development, sustainable development, Kyiv
Pages: 
25-33
References: 

1. New Urban Agenda. United Nations. 2017. URL: https://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-Ukrainian.pdf
 
2. United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat II). 1996. URL: https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/istanbul-declaration.pdf
 
3. Bunnell T. (2019). Inclusiveness in Urban Theory and Urban-Centred International Development Policy. Journal of Regional and City Planning. Vol. 30, 2, 89-101, August 2019. DOI: https://doi: 10.5614/jpwk.2019.30.2.1.
https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2019.30.2.1
 
4. Atkinson R. (2000). Combating Social Exclusion in Europe: The New Urban Policy Challenge. Urban Studies. Vol. 37, 5-6, 1037-1055, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980050011226
https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980050011226
 
5. Edwards J. (1997). Urban policy: the victory of form over substance? Urban Studies, 34, 825-843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098975844
https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098975844
 
6. Leibfried S., Pierson P. (1992). Prospects for Social Europe. Politics and Society, 20, 333-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003232929202000305
https://doi.org/10.1177/003232929202000305
 
7. Healey P. (1998). Collaborative Planning in a Stakeholder Society. The Town Planning Review, Vol. 69, 1, 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.69.1.h651u2327m86326p
https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.69.1.h651u2327m86326p
 
8. Healey P. (1999). Institutional Analysis, Communicative Planning, and Shaping Places. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19 (2), 111-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9901900201
https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9901900201
 
9. Judith E. Innes (1995). Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14 (3), 183-189.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9501400307
 
10. Gerometta J, Haussermann H, Longo G. (2005). Social Innovation and Civil Society in Urban Governance: Strategies for an Inclusive City. Urban Studies, Vol. 42, 11, 2007-2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080%2F00420980500279851
https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279851
 
11. Arnstein Sherry R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35 (4): 216-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
 
12. Sassen. S (1991). The Global City. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 288 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/027046769301300240
https://doi.org/10.1177/027046769301300240
 
13. Harding A. (1997). Urban Regimes in a Europe of the Cities? European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 4, 4, 291-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096977649700400401
https://doi.org/10.1177/096977649700400401
 
14. Kearns A., Paddison R. (2020). New Challenges for Urban Governance. Urban Studies, Vol. 37, 5-6, 845-850. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980050011118
https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980050011118
 
15. Inclusive Cities. The World Bank. URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/inclusive-cities#1
 
16. Lisovskyi S.A., Maruniak Eu.O., Gukalova I.V., Mozgovyi A.A., Pokliatzkyi S.A. (2019). Inclusiveness and environmental priorities of urban development as components of quality of life DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2019.02.013 [In Ukrainian]. [Лісовський С.А., Маруняк Є.О., Гукалова І.В., Мозговий А.А., Покляцький С.А. Інклюзивність та екологічні пріоритети міського розвитку, як складові якості життя населення (приклади модельних міст) // Укр. геогр. журн. № 2. С. 1322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2019.02.013]
https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2019.02.013
 
17. Urban Environment & Social Inclusion. URL : https://datadrivenlab.org/urban/report/methods/
 
18. Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities (2007). URL: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/themes/urban/leipzig_charter.pdf
 
19. The decision of Kyiv City Council from July 6, 2017 N 724/2886 About modification of the decision of the Kiev city council from December 15, 2011 N 824/7060 «About the statement of Strategy of development of the city of Kyiv till 2025». URL: http://kmr.ligazakon.ua/SITE2/l_docki2.nsf/alldocWWW/5FB5A5660E66740DC22581710068840C? OpenDocument [In Ukrainian]. [Рішення КМР від 6 липня 2017 року № 724/2886 Про внесення змін до рішення Київської міської ради від 15 грудня 2011 року N 824/7060 «Про затвердження Стратегії розвитку міста Києва до 2025 року». URL: http://kmr.ligazakon.ua/SITE2/l_docki2.nsf/alldocWWW/5FB5A5660E66740DC22581710068840C?OpenDocument]
 
20. Kyiv City Council. Official site. Current city programs. URL: https://kmr.gov.ua/municipal-target-programs [In Ukrainian]. [Київська міська рада. Офіційний сайт. Діючі міські програми URL: https://kmr.gov.ua/municipal-target-programs]
 
21. Podil District State Administration in Kyiv. Official web portal of the Kyiv City State Administration. URL: https://podil.kyivcity.gov.ua/news/13702.html [In Ukrainian]. [Подільська районна в місті Києві державна адміністрація. Офіційний веб-портал КМДА. URL: https://podil.kyivcity.gov.ua/news/13702.html]
 
22. General development plan of Kyiv and its suburbs until 2025. URL: http://kievgenplan.grad.gov.ua/generalnyj-plan/ [In Ukrainian]. [Генеральний план розвитку м. Києва та його приміської зони до 2025 року. URL: http://kievgenplan.grad.gov.ua/generalnyj-plan/]
 
23. Neighborhoods are selected in accordance with the approaches and practices of urban planning. URL: https://flatfy.ua/uk [In Ukrainian]. [Мікрорайони виділені відповідно до підходів та практики містобудівної діяльності. URL: https://flatfy.ua/uk]
 
24. Where in Kyiv is the closest to parks and squares? (2019). URL: https://misto.lun.ua/ozelenennya [In Ukrainian]. [Де в Києві найближче до парків і скверів? 2019. URL: https://misto.lun.ua/ozelenennya].
 
25. Mezentsev K.V., Provotar N.I., Palchuk M.V. (2020). Public spaces through the lens of participatory urban planning  the case of Kyiv. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 2, 3037. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.15407/ugz2020.02.030 [In Ukrainian]. [Мезенцев К.В., Провотар Н.І., Пальчук М.В. Публічні простори через призму партисипативного міського планування  приклад Києва. Укр. геогр. журн. 2020. № 2. С. 3037. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.15407/ugz2020.02.030]
https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2020.02.030
 
26. Population density in Kyiv: what is it now and what is the prospect? (2019). URL: https://misto.lun.ua/shchilnist-naselennia [In Ukrainian]. [Щільність населення Києва: що зараз і яка перспектива? (2019). URL: https://misto.lun.ua/shchilnist-naselennia]