Prokopenko, N. A. COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE LABOR POTENTIAL OF THE REGIONS OF UKRAINE

DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2023.01.046
Ukr. Geogr. Ž. No. 1. 46–53.
Language of publication: 
Ukrainian
Full text: 
Authors: 
Prokopenko, N. A.,
 
D. F. Chebotarev State Institute of Gerontology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
Abstract: 

The article substantiates the main problems affecting the state and development of the labor potential of the regions of Ukraine and the state as a whole. Theoretical and methodological aspects and the evolution of approaches to the study of the essence and assessment of the labor potential of the region are highlighted. The author’s approach to the interpretation of the structure of the labor potential of the region with the justification of its quantitative and qualitative characteristics is proposed, methodological tools for assessing the state of the labor potential of the region are developed. The methodology was tested on official statistical data on the regions of Ukraine for 2020. Based on the analysis of the obtained integral characteristics, the regions of Ukraine were grouped, taking into account the qualitative and quantitative components of the labor potential. Spatial regularities in the placement of the labor potential of the territories of Ukraine are revealed. Most regions of the southwestern part of Ukraine are characterized by high levels of the qualitative component of the labor potential (mainly due to high health indicators) and high levels of the quantitative component of the labor potential, but it has been found that the existing labor potential in these regions is not used effectively. Large industrial regions in the east of Ukraine have a high level of the qualitative component, but an insufficient level of the quantitative component of the labor potential. The northern regions of the country are characterized by low indicators of both quantitative and qualitative components. Firstly, it concerns the Chernihiv and Sumy regions. Southern regions, such as Mykolaiv and Kherson regions, are characterized by high rates of the quantitative component of the labor potential against the background of a low level of the qualitative component. Kyiv is the only region with a high level of qualitative and quantitative component of labor potential. The results of the study can be used in the course of the implementation of the state regional policy, in the activities of municipal and regional governments when making strategic and operational decisions.

Key words: 
labor potential of the region, characteristics of labor potential, combined approach, comprehensive assessment, state regional policy
Pages: 
46-53
References: 
1. Bordean, O.N., & Sonea, A. (2018). Student satisfaction and perceived skills: any link to employability? In Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(1), 356–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(22).
2. Kjellstrom, T., Kovats, R.S., Lloyd, S.J., Holt, T., & Tol, R.S. (2009). The direct impact of climate change on regional labor productivity.  Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health, 64(4), 217–227.
3. Shevyakin, A.S. (2020). Methodological Approaches for Prediction of the Level of Provision of Regional Economy by Labor Resources. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 128, 1828–1832.
4. Tretyakova, L.A., Bessonova, M.A., Trofimenko, E.N. (2014). The essence of the category ‘labor potential’: socio-economic aspect. Regional Economics. Theory and Practice, 34, 2–10.
5. Ganich, L.V. (2013). Study of the concept of ‘Labor potential’ in the conditions of a market economy. In Social and labor relations: theory and practice (Collection of scientific papers). Kyiv. KNEU, 86–91. [Ганіч Л. В. Дослідження поняття «трудовий потенціал» в умовах ринкової економіки // Соціально-трудові відносини: теорія і практика (Зб. наук. праць). К.: КНЕУ. 2013. С. 86-91]
6. Quintini, G. (2014). Skills at Work: How Skills and their Use Matter in the Labour Market. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, 158. OECD Publishing, URI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz44fdfjm7j-en.
7. Rossoshanskaya, E. A. (2019). Agent-based models in labor potential reproduction management at municipal level: application possibilities and perspectives. Public administration. Electronic bulletin, 73, 249–266.
8. Kupets, Olga. (2012). Characteristics and Determinants of Internal Labor Mobility in Ukraine. World Bank, Washington, DC, URI: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/26804 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO
9. Lubsanova, N., & Mikheeva A. (2020). Comparative assessment of the potential of the regions of the zone of influence of the Great Silk and Tea Road. WSEAS Transactions on business and economics, 17, 638–645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2020.17.61.
10. Simonova, M.,  Kolesnikov S. & Karakova T. (2017). Assessment of labor potential on the regional level by the index method.  MATEC Web of Conferences 170, 01069 https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817001069.
11. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Statistical information. URL : http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua [In Ukrainian]. [Державна служба статистики України. Статистична інформація. URL : http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.]
12. Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine for 2020. (2021). SSSU, 454 [In Ukrainian]. [Статистичний щорічник України за 2020 рік. Київ. ДССУ. 2021, 454 с.]
13. Prokopenko, N.A. (2017). Labor potential of Ukraine: gerontological aspect. Probl. aging and longevity, 3–4, 318–329 [In Ukrainian]. [Прокопенко Н. А. Трудовой потенциал Украины: геронтологический аспект // Пробл. старения и долголетия. 2017. № 3–4. С. 318–329.]
14. Čerep, A.V. (2017). Problemy budowania wykwalifikowanego potencjalu ludzkiego. Zeszyty naukowe „Organizacja i zarzadzanie” Politechniki slaskiej. 75–84.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2017.108.7
15. Kawanishi, Y. (2008). On Karo-Jisatsu (Suicide by Overwork): Why Do Japanese Workers Work Themselves to Death? International Journal of Mental Health, 1(37). 61–74. 
16. Waters, S. (2015). Suicide as Protest in the French Workplace. Modern & Contemporary France, 23(4). 491–510.