Kovály, K. P. The Role of Social Capital in the Investment Activities of the Ukrainian Entrepreneurs in the Czech Republic

DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2025.01.053
Ukr. Geogr. z. 2025, No. 1:53-61
Authors: 

Kovály, K. P.  


Geographical Institute Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Hungarian Research Network, Budapest, Hungary;
Department of Eart Sciences and Tourism, Ferenc Rakoczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian College of Higher Education, Berehove, Ukraine

 

Abstract: 

This research presents the concept of social capital. It highlights its use in the economic performance of the Ukrainian migrant entrepreneurs in the Czech Republic from a geographical perspective, representing a novel approach to Ukrainian (and Hungarian) social geography. The main goal of the present research was to find out the role of informal and formal ethnic ties in their business and its spatial organization. In our analysis, we use the individual approach of social capital, relying on existing academic publications but adapting it to the research field, going in line with personal ties, which are closely connected with mutual trust, cooperation, contacts, and mutual aid and solidarity. We concentrate on the first generation of Ukrainian entrepreneurs, even though the whole group of Ukrainian immigrants formed the biggest minority group in the Czech Republic for years. Using the data from the settlement-level company database obtained from the Czech State Register of Companies, we could map the spatial organization of their business locations. The article’s results are based on qualitative research from in-depth semi-structured interviews with Ukrainian entrepreneurs and key actors of the Ukrainian migrant community. Using data taken from the Czech register of Ukrainian entrepreneurs, we were able to map the spatial location of their businesses. Based on our investigation, we conclude that Ukrainian entrepreneurs do not use their social capital to the available extent. A network of contacts exists among them, but their utilization for economic cooperation is rather limited, which seems to be caused by the low level of trust. Ukrainian entrepreneurs cooperate more with Czechs or other Western entrepreneurs than with their co-ethnics. According to our findings, negative experiences inherited from the culture of the USSR contribute to this, as does the current situation with high corruption and bureaucratic system in the country of origin. The other reason for the low willingness among co-ethnics for economic cooperation is the desire of Ukrainian entrepreneurs to integrate into the Czech society. Mutual solidarity, presented in private life and economic activities, does not play a significant role. It also turned out that social capital plays an indirect role in the spatial organization of Ukrainian businesses.

Key words: 
social capital, Czech Republic, Ukraine, migration, entrepreneurship
Pages: 
53-61
References: 
1. Kovály, K. (2019). The role of ethnic social capital in the spatial organization of enterprises—the case of Central and Eastern European investments (Doctoral dissertation thesis). Department of Social and Economic Geography at ELTE, Geographical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest. Retrieved from https://edit.elte.hu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10831/51764/Kovaly_tezisek_ENG.pdf

2. Flap H., Kumcu A. & Bulder B. (1998). The social capital of ethnic entrepreneurs and their business success. Immigrant Businesses. 142–161. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781403905338_9

3. Sik, E. (2012). The sociology of relational capital. ELTE TáTK, Budapest, 172 p.  [In Hungarian]. [ Sik, E. (2012). A kapcsolati tőke szociológiája. ELTE TáTK, Budapest, 172 p. ] URL: https://tarki.hu/hu/about/staff/sb/kapcsolati_toke_szociologiaja.pdf

4. Czech Statistical Office (2023): URL: https://www.czso.cz/csu/cizinci/number-offoreigners-data#rok

5. Leontiyeva, Y., Fedyuk, O., & Kindler, M. (2016). Ukrainians in the Czech Republic: On the pathway from temporary foreign workers to one of the largest minority groups. Ukrainian migration to the European Union. IMISCOE Research Series. pp. 133–149. URL: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-41776-9_8

6. Drbohlav D., Jánská E., Šelepová Š. (2001). The Ukrainian Community in the Czech Republic. In: Šišková, T. (ed.): Minorities and migrants in the Czech Republic, Prague: Portal, pp. 89–98. [In Czech] [ Drbohlav D., Jánská E., Šelepová Š. (2001), Ukrajinská komunita v České Republice. In: Šišková, T. (ed.): Menšiny a migranty v ČR, Praha: Portál, pp. 89–98.] URL: https://www.cizinci.cz/documents/551336/568661/ukrajinska_komunita.pdf

7. Leontiyeva, Y. (2014). Ukrainian migration to Europe: Policies, practices and perspectives. Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 1, pp. 5–10. URL: http://www.ceemr.uw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/CEEMR_Vol_3_No_1_Leontiyeva_Editorial.pdf

8. Drbohlav D., Dzúrová, D. (2007). “Where are they going?” Immigrant inclusion in the Czech Republic (A case study on Ukrainians, Vietnamese, and Armenians in Prague). International Migration. 45 (2), pp. 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2007.00404.x

9. Čermáková D., Kohlbacher J. (2012). Ethnic entrepreneurship. Case study: Prague, Czech Republic. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. URL: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2012/ethnic-entrepreneurship-case-study-prague-czech-republic

10. Čermáková D., Nekorjak M. (2009). Ukrainian middleman system of labour organization in the Czech Republic. Journal of Economic and Social Geography. Blackwell. 100 (1). 33–43. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00505.x

11. Hanifan, L. J. (1916). The rural school community center. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67, pp. 130–138. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1013498.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000271621606700118

12. Bourdieu, P. (1983). Forms of capital. In: Richardson, J. (ed.): Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood Press, New York, pp. 241–258. URL: https://www.socialcapitalgateway.org/sites/socialcapitalgateway.org/files/data/paper/2016/10/18/rbasicsbourdieu1986-theformsofcapital.pdf

13. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, Chicago, pp. 95–120. URL: https://www.econ.msu.ru/cmt2/lib/c/477/File/Social%20Capital%20in%20the%20Creation%20of%20Human%20Capital.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228943

14. Sikora V. (2001). Speech at the scientific roundtable “Security of economic transformations” / From social security to social policy. Edited by Ya. A. Zhalil. Kyiv: Satsanga. 100 p. [In Ukrainian]. [ Сікора В. Виступ на круглому столі «Безпека економічних трансформацій» / Від соціального забезпечення до соціальної політики: Зб. ст. за ред. Я. А. Жаліла. К. : Сатсанга, 2001. 100 с. ]

15. Demjancsuk, O. I. (2016). Formation of properties of social capital of the enterprise. Scientific notes of Ostroh Academy National University, “Economisc” series. 6: 270–276.  [In Ukrainian]. [ Дем’янчук О. І. Формування властивостей соціального капіталу підприємства // Наукові записки Національного університету «Острозька академія». Серія «Економіка». 2016. № 6, С. 270–276. ] URL: https://eprints.oa.edu.ua/7041/1/39.pdf

16. Hricaenko, M. I. (2017). Social capital in establishing the business network of the agricultural sector of Ukraine. Еconomika APK. 5. pp. 58–64. [In Ukrainian].[ Грицаєнко М. І. Соціальний капітал у встановленні підприємницької мережі аграрної сфери України // Економіка АПК. 2017. № 5. C. 58–64. ] URL: https://eapk.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/e_apk_2017_5_3_-58-64.pdf

17. Gödri, I. (2007). The role of relational capital in Hungarian immigration. Minority Research. 16 (4). pp. 699–727. [In Hungarian].  [ Gödri, I. (2007). A kapcsolati tőke szerepe a magyarországi bevándorlásban. Kisebbségkutatás. 16 (4). pp. 699–727. ] URL: https://epa.oszk.hu/00400/00462/00036/1510.htm

18. Kovály K., Čermáková, D. (2016). The role of social capital in economic life of the Ukrainian entrepreneurs in Czechia. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geographica, 51 (2). 135–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2016.11

19. Várhalmi, Z., Kováts, A. (2013). Entrepreneurial migrants in Hungary. Immigration and integration. Hungarian data, European indicators. Hungarian Academy of Sciences Social Science Research Center, Minority Research Institute, Budapest, pp. 89–101. [In Hungarian].  [ Várhalmi, Z., Kováts, A. (2013). Vállalkozó migránsok Magyarországon. Bevándorlás és integráció. Magyarországi adatok, Európai indikátorok. MTA Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont, Kisebbségkutató Intézet, Budapest, 89–101. ] 

20. Szereda, Yu. V. (2013). Social capital in Ukraine and other European countries: the legitimacy of the aggregate construct. Ukrainian society. 4 (47). pp. 81–97.  [In Ukrainian]. [ Середа Ю. В. Cоціальний капітал в Україні та інших країнах Європи: легітимність агрегованого конструкту. Український соціум. 2013. № 4 (47). С. 81–97. ] DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/socium2013.04.081

21. Berry, J. (1994): Acculturation and psychological adaptation: An overview. In: Bouvy, A. et al. (eds.): Journeys into cross-cultural psychology, pp. 129–141.