О. Карасьов, І. Черваньов. НЕМАТЕРІАЛЬНЕ ПРИРОДОКОРИСТУВАННЯ: «ТІНЬОВИЙ СЕКТОР» В НАУКАХ ПРО ДОВКІЛЛЯ

1. McPhearson T., Raymond C., Gulsrud N., Albert C., Coles N., Fagerholm N/, Nagatsu M., Olafsson A.S., Soininen N., Vierikko K/ (2021). Radical changes are needed for transformations to a good Anthropocene. npj Urban Sustainability, 1, 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00017-x
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00017-x
 
2. Purvis B., Mao Y., Robinson D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14, 681-695 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
 
3. Rudenko L.G., Lisovskyi S., Maruniak E (2020) Dilemmas of regional development in Ukraine. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 3, 36-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2020.03.036]
https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2020.03.036
 
4. Bagrov N., Rudenko L., Chervanev I. (2012). "New" geography in ukrainian reality: mission and development trends. Geography, environment, sustainability , 5, 18-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2012-5-2-18-35
https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2012-5-2-18-35
 
5. Angelstam P., Grodzynskyi M., Andersson K., Axelsson R., Elbakidze M., Khoroshev A., Kruhlov I., Naumov V. (2013). Measurement, collaborative learning and research for sustainable use of ecosystem services: Landscape concepts and Europe as Laboratory. Ambio, 42, 129-145 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0368-0
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0368-0
 
6. Nijhuis S., van Lammeren R., van der Hoeven F (eds). (2011). Exploring the visual landscape. Research in Urbanism Series. Vol. 2. Amsterdam, 336 p.
 
7. Bruley E., Locatelli B., Lavorel S. (2021). Nature's contributions to people: coproducing quality of life from multifunctional landscapes. Ecology and Society, 26 (1), 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/es-12031-260112
https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12031-260112
 
8. OECD Tourism Trends and Policies (2020). Paris, 387p https://doi.org/10.1787/6b47b985-en.
https://doi.org/10.1787/6b47b985-en
 
9. De Soto H. (2000) The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. 288 p.
 
10. Dyba V.M. (2017). Accounting and analysis of intangible assets in the context of institutional change: theory and methodology. Manuscript. Thesis for a degree of doctor of economical sciences. Kyiv, 34 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Диба В.М. Облік та аналіз нематеріальних активів в умовах інституційних змін: теорія і методологія: автореф. дис... д-ра. екон. наук. Київ, 2017. 34 с.]
 
11. Tarasenko S.V. (2011). Ecological and economic principles of regional development based on the formation of intangible assets. Manuscript. Thesis for a degree of candidate of economical sciences in speciality 08.00.06. Sumy, 21 p. [In Ukrainian]. [Тарасенко С.Еколого-економічні засади регіонального розвитку на основі формування нематеріальних активів: автореф. … канд. екон. наук. 08.00.06. Суми, 2011. 21 с.]
 
12. Karasov O. (2020). Landscape metrics and cultural ecosystem services: an integrative resource-driven mapping approach for landscape harmony. A Thesis for applying for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Protection. Tartu, 187 p.
 
13. Schröter M., Başak E., Christie M., Church A., Keune H., Osipova E., Oteros-Rozas E., Sievers-Glotzbach S., van Oudenhoven A.P.E., Balvanera P., González D., Jacobs S., Molnár Z., Pascual U., Martín-López B. (2020). Indicators for relational values of nature's contributions to good quality of life: the IPBES approach for Europe and Central Asia. Ecosystems and People, 16, 50-69.
https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1703039
 
14. Chervanyov I.G., Karasov O.O. (2015).The intangible natural resources (INR) in the aspects of natural capital of new geography: some perspectives for Ukraine. Visnyk of V N Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Geology. Geography. Ecology, 1157. Iss. 42, 106-110.
 
15. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2012). Rome, 134 p/
 
16. Stålhammar S., Thorén H. (2019). Three perspectives on relational values of nature. Sustainability Science. 14, 1201-1212 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00718-4
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00718-4
 
17. Klain SC, Olmsted P, Chan KMA, Satterfield T (2017) .Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values, or the New Ecological Paradigm. PLOS ONE 12:e0183962. URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0183962 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183962
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183962
 
18. Espey J. (2019). Sustainable development will falter without data. Nature, 571 (7765), 299 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02139-w
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02139-w
 
19. Fritz S., Fonte C., See L. (2017) .The Role of Citizen Science in Earth Observation. Remote Sensing , 9 (4), 357. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/9/4/357/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9040357
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9040357
 
20. Fücks R. (2013). Intelligent wachsen. Die grüne Revolution. Munchen, 371 p.
https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446434981
 
21. Price C (2017). Landscape Economics. London, 464 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54873-9
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54873-9
 
22. TEEB (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations. Ed. by Pushpam Kumar. London and Washington, 422 p.
 
23. Potschin M.B., Haines-Young R.H. (2011). Ecosystem services: Exploring a geographical perspective. Progress in Physical Geography, 35 (5), 575-594.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311423172
 
24. Pascual U., Balvanera P., Díaz S., Pataki G., Roth E., Stenseke M., Watson R.T., Başak Dessane E., Islar M., Kelemen E., Maris V., Quaas M., Subramanian S.M., Wittmer H., Adlan A., Ahn S.E., Al-Hafedh Y.S., Amankwah E. Asah S.T., Berry P., Bilgin A., Breslow S..J, Bullock C., Cáceres D., Daly-Hassen H., Figueroa E., Golden C.D., Gómez-Baggethun E., González-Jiménez D., Houdet .J, Keune H., Kumar R., Ma K., May P.H., Mead A., O'Farrell P., Pandit R., Pengue W., Pichis-Madruga R. Popa F., Preston S., Pacheco-Balanza D., Saarikoski H., Strassburg B.B., van den Belt M., Verma M., Wickson F., Yagi N. (2017). Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26 - 27, 7 - 16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006
 
25. Barton D.N., Obst C., Day B., Caparrós A., Dadvand P., Fenichel E., Havinga I., Hein L., McPhearson T., Randrup T. Z.G. (2019). Discussion paper 10: Recreation services from ecosystems. Paper submitted to the Expert Meeting on Advancing the Measurement of Ecosystem Services for Ecosystem Accounting. New York, 22-24 January 2019 and subsequently revised. Version of 25 March 2019, 55. URL: https://seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/discussion_paper_10_-_recreation_services_final_0.pd
 
26. Daniel T.C., Muhar A., Arnberger A., Aznar O., Boyd J.W., Chan K.M.A., Costanza R., Elmqvist T., Flint C.G., Gobster P.H., Grêt-Regamey A., Lave R., Muhar S., Penker M., Ribe R.G., Schauppenlehner T., Sikor T., Soloviy I., Spierenburg M., Taczanowska K,. Tam ., von der Dunk A. (2012) .Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109. 8812-9 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114773109
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114773109
 
27. Kirchhoff T. (2012). Pivotal cultural values of nature cannot be integrated into the ecosystem services framework. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109 (46), E3146. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1212409109
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212409109
 
28. Lothian A. (1999). Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: Is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning, 44,177-198 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5
 
29. European Landscape Convention (2000). Council of Europe. Report and Convention. Florence, 7. URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/landscape/the-european-landscape-convention
 
30. Forman R.T.T. (1995). Land mosaics : the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge, 632 p.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107050327
 
31. Waterton E (2019) More-than-representational landscapes. In: The Routledge Companion to Landscape Studies, 91-101, London, 652 p.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315195063-7
 
32. Nowosad J., Stepinski T.F. (2019). Information theory as a consistent framework for quantification and classification of landscape patterns. Landscape Ecology, 34, 2091-2101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00830-x
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00830-x
 
33. Naveh Z., Lieberman A.S. (1984). Landscape ecology: theory and application. Springer-Verlag, New York, 341p.
 
34. Uuemaa E.,, Mander Ü., Marja R. (2013). Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review. Ecological Indicators, 28, 100-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2012.07.018
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.018
 
35. Karasov O., Külvik M., Burdun I. (2019). Deconstructing landscape pattern: applications of remote sensing to physiognomic landscape mapping. GeoJournal, 86, 529-555 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10058-6
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10058-6